Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 16 3 14 - 1 - 121 30.3
2 Randolph-Macon 5 17 6 16 1 0 0 162 32.4
3 Ferrum 5 12 3 12 - - - 111 22.2
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 10 0 13 2 1 0 139 27.8
5 Bridgewater 5 15 2 8 1 0 0 106 21.2
6 Shenandoah 5 13 1 11 0 0 0 92 18.4
7 Southern Virginia 4 10 - 10 - - - 70 17.5
8 Guilford 4 5 - - - - - 30 7.5
9 Washington and Lee - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 826 907 1733 433.3
2 Randolph-Macon 5 1022 865 1887 377.4
3 Ferrum 5 569 1220 1789 357.8
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 819 953 1772 354.4
5 Bridgewater 5 644 873 1517 303.4
6 Shenandoah 5 361 1058 1419 283.8
7 Southern Virginia 4 441 658 1099 274.8
8 Guilford 4 120 425 545 136.3
9 Washington and Lee - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 907 60-122-3 226.8 7.4 15.1 6
2 Randolph-Macon 5 865 65-113-3 173.0 7.7 13.3 10
3 Ferrum 5 1220 99-175-3 244.0 7.0 12.3 10
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 953 75-125-4 190.6 7.6 12.7 8
5 Bridgewater 5 873 78-144-4 174.6 6.1 11.2 5
6 Shenandoah 5 1058 118-186-8 211.6 5.7 9.0 4
7 Southern Virginia 4 658 59-127-8 164.5 5.2 11.2 6
8 Guilford 4 425 36-96-4 106.3 4.4 11.8 2
9 Washington and Lee - - 0-0-0 - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 826 178 206.5 4.6 9
2 Randolph-Macon 5 1022 232 204.4 4.4 11
3 Ferrum 5 569 193 113.8 2.9 4
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 819 233 163.8 3.5 12
5 Bridgewater 5 644 161 128.8 4.0 7
6 Shenandoah 5 361 116 72.2 3.1 8
7 Southern Virginia 4 441 144 110.3 3.1 3
8 Guilford 4 120 126 30.0 1.0 3
9 Washington and Lee - - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 92 50 37 5 23.0
2 Randolph-Macon 5 109 60 42 7 21.8
3 Ferrum 5 102 41 50 11 20.4
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 100 55 36 9 20.0
5 Bridgewater 5 85 38 41 6 17.0
6 Shenandoah 5 71 20 48 3 14.2
7 Southern Virginia 4 63 23 35 5 15.8
8 Guilford 4 36 12 19 5 9.0
9 Washington and Lee - - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 29-63 46% 3-12 25%
2 Randolph-Macon 5 31-66 47% 5-9 56%
3 Ferrum 5 34-85 40% 9-20 45%
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 35-77 45% 9-21 43%
5 Bridgewater 5 26-64 41% 5-13 38%
6 Shenandoah 5 24-65 37% 9-15 60%
7 Southern Virginia 4 18-64 28% 6-10 60%
8 Guilford 4 12-54 22% 5-10 50%
9 Washington and Lee - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 8-248 31.0 1-3 3.0
2 Randolph-Macon 5 8-139 17.4 0-0 -
3 Ferrum 5 13-173 13.3 4-22 5.5
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 13-275 21.2 0-0 -
5 Bridgewater 5 14-399 28.5 3-20 6.7
6 Shenandoah 5 23-428 18.6 6-32 5.3
7 Southern Virginia 4 18-250 13.9 6-68 11.3
8 Guilford 4 24-497 20.7 2-20 10.0
9 Washington and Lee - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 3-3 100.0% 14-16 87.5% 18-560 31.1 22-971 44.1
2 Randolph-Macon 5 6-8 75.0% 16-19 84.2% 16-549 34.3 31-1708 55.1
3 Ferrum 5 3-5 60.0% 12-13 92.3% 20-626 31.3 22-1232 56.0
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 0-1 0.0% 13-15 86.7% 14-508 36.3 24-1024 42.7
5 Bridgewater 5 2-3 66.7% 8-11 72.7% 20-731 36.5 22-1101 50.0
6 Shenandoah 5 1-1 100.0% 11-12 91.7% 25-879 35.2 18-1040 57.8
7 Southern Virginia 4 0-0 - 10-10 100.0% 27-845 31.3 14-560 40.0
8 Guilford 4 0-0 - 0-3 0.0% 27-961 35.6 10-485 48.5
9 Washington and Lee - 0-0 - 0-0 - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 15-17 88% 12-17 71%
2 Randolph-Macon 5 20-19 105% 17-19 89%
3 Ferrum 5 15-23 65% 12-23 52%
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 16-27 59% 16-27 59%
5 Bridgewater 5 12-18 67% 10-18 56%
6 Shenandoah 5 10-15 67% 9-15 60%
7 Southern Virginia 4 7-8 88% 7-8 88%
8 Guilford 4 4-5 80% 4-5 80%
9 Washington and Lee - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 4-2 3 6 6-90 15.0 0 201 25
2 Randolph-Macon 5 3-1 2 3 3-33 11.0 0 259 12
3 Ferrum 5 14-9 3 4 4-36 9.0 1 326 11
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 5-2 5 6 6-79 13.2 0 317 13
5 Bridgewater 5 6-2 2 7 7-85 12.1 2 330 5
6 Shenandoah 5 6-4 1 4 4-126 31.5 1 357 8
7 Southern Virginia 4 9-5 7 4 4-20 5.0 1 295 5
8 Guilford 4 11-7 3 2 2--3 -1.5 0 265 3
9 Washington and Lee - 0-0 - - 0-0 - - 0 -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 19 4.8 184 46.0
2 Randolph-Macon 5 21 4.2 196 39.2
3 Ferrum 5 40 8.0 405 81.0
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 22 4.4 181 36.2
5 Bridgewater 5 28 5.6 322 64.4
6 Shenandoah 5 27 5.4 343 68.6
7 Southern Virginia 4 28 7.0 271 67.8
8 Guilford 4 28 7.0 284 71.0
9 Washington and Lee - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 8.3 33 203.8 164.3 39.5 50.3 6 3 25 0
2 Randolph-Macon 5 12.2 61 241.2 166.0 75.2 51.8 3 3 12 0
3 Ferrum 5 26.4 132 299.6 150.8 148.8 65.2 4 5 11 1
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 12.2 61 236.8 171.6 65.2 63.4 6 2 13 0
5 Bridgewater 5 19.0 95 363.0 237.4 125.6 66.0 7 4 5 2
6 Shenandoah 5 29.0 145 359.8 166.4 193.4 71.4 4 2 8 1
7 Southern Virginia 4 30.5 122 363.5 222.3 141.3 73.8 4 5 5 1
8 Guilford 4 43.8 175 471.8 256.0 215.8 66.3 2 2 3 0
9 Washington and Lee - - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 4 32:17 2,000 1,000
2 Randolph-Macon 5 35:08 1,008 336
3 Ferrum 5 30:19 1,250 625
4 Hampden-Sydney 5 31:45 2,250 750
5 Bridgewater 5 27:60 500 250
6 Shenandoah 5 27:34 1,500 500
7 Southern Virginia 4 30:38 500 250
8 Guilford 4 24:50 100 50
9 Washington and Lee - 0:00 - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 15 2 13 - 1 - 111 37.0
2 Randolph-Macon 4 15 6 15 1 0 0 149 37.3
3 Ferrum 4 12 3 9 - - - 90 22.5
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 10 0 6 2 1 0 90 22.5
5 Bridgewater 3 9 - 3 - - - 57 19.0
6 Shenandoah 3 8 1 6 0 0 0 57 19.0
7 Southern Virginia 3 6 - 6 - - - 42 14.0
8 Guilford 4 5 - - - - - 30 7.5
9 Washington and Lee - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 791 608 1399 466.3
2 Randolph-Macon 4 879 722 1601 400.3
3 Ferrum 4 486 958 1444 361.0
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 592 742 1334 333.5
5 Bridgewater 3 328 607 935 311.7
6 Shenandoah 3 269 575 844 281.3
7 Southern Virginia 3 241 508 749 249.7
8 Guilford 4 120 425 545 136.3
9 Washington and Lee - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 608 33-73-2 202.7 8.3 18.4 5
2 Randolph-Macon 4 722 55-89-2 180.5 8.1 13.1 9
3 Ferrum 4 958 75-144-2 239.5 6.7 12.8 8
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 742 61-102-3 185.5 7.3 12.2 6
5 Bridgewater 3 607 49-92-3 202.3 6.6 12.4 3
6 Shenandoah 3 575 65-104-4 191.7 5.5 8.8 2
7 Southern Virginia 3 508 47-99-6 169.3 5.1 10.8 4
8 Guilford 4 425 36-96-4 106.3 4.4 11.8 2
9 Washington and Lee - - 0-0-0 - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 791 149 263.7 5.3 9
2 Randolph-Macon 4 879 196 219.8 4.5 10
3 Ferrum 4 486 159 121.5 3.1 3
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 592 178 148.0 3.3 7
5 Bridgewater 3 328 78 109.3 4.2 5
6 Shenandoah 3 269 68 89.7 4.0 5
7 Southern Virginia 3 241 92 80.3 2.6 2
8 Guilford 4 120 126 30.0 1.0 3
9 Washington and Lee - - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 70 45 22 3 23.3
2 Randolph-Macon 4 91 50 35 6 22.8
3 Ferrum 4 82 36 38 8 20.5
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 77 42 29 6 19.3
5 Bridgewater 3 47 17 28 2 15.7
6 Shenandoah 3 42 15 25 2 14.0
7 Southern Virginia 3 46 14 28 4 15.3
8 Guilford 4 36 12 19 5 9.0
9 Washington and Lee - - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 23-46 50% 2-8 25%
2 Randolph-Macon 4 26-54 48% 5-9 56%
3 Ferrum 4 27-72 38% 9-18 50%
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 27-60 45% 4-14 29%
5 Bridgewater 3 17-36 47% 2-8 25%
6 Shenandoah 3 16-36 44% 3-7 43%
7 Southern Virginia 3 14-45 31% 3-6 50%
8 Guilford 4 12-54 22% 5-10 50%
9 Washington and Lee - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 6-207 34.5 1-3 3.0
2 Randolph-Macon 4 8-139 17.4 0-0 -
3 Ferrum 4 8-114 14.3 4-5 1.3
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 10-175 17.5 0-0 -
5 Bridgewater 3 10-303 30.3 2-17 8.5
6 Shenandoah 3 17-317 18.6 4-10 2.5
7 Southern Virginia 3 16-177 11.1 1-22 22.0
8 Guilford 4 24-497 20.7 2-20 10.0
9 Washington and Lee - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 2-2 100.0% 13-15 86.7% 13-440 33.8 20-884 44.2
2 Randolph-Macon 4 6-7 85.7% 15-18 83.3% 10-349 34.9 29-1587 54.7
3 Ferrum 4 3-5 60.0% 9-10 90.0% 18-539 29.9 19-1061 55.8
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 0-1 0.0% 6-8 75.0% 13-472 36.3 16-653 40.8
5 Bridgewater 3 0-0 - 3-6 50.0% 10-373 37.3 12-518 43.2
6 Shenandoah 3 1-1 100.0% 6-7 85.7% 13-445 34.2 11-617 56.1
7 Southern Virginia 3 0-0 - 6-6 100.0% 19-525 27.6 9-399 44.3
8 Guilford 4 0-0 - 0-3 0.0% 27-961 35.6 10-485 48.5
9 Washington and Lee - 0-0 - 0-0 - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 13-13 100% 11-13 85%
2 Randolph-Macon 4 18-18 100% 15-18 83%
3 Ferrum 4 13-20 65% 10-20 50%
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 10-19 53% 10-19 53%
5 Bridgewater 3 7-11 64% 7-11 64%
6 Shenandoah 3 6-9 67% 5-9 56%
7 Southern Virginia 3 4-4 100% 4-4 100%
8 Guilford 4 4-5 80% 4-5 80%
9 Washington and Lee - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 4-2 2 5 5-67 13.4 0 153 21
2 Randolph-Macon 4 2-0 2 2 2-11 5.5 0 196 9
3 Ferrum 4 9-6 3 3 3-36 12.0 1 244 10
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 4-1 2 5 5-53 10.6 0 245 9
5 Bridgewater 3 3-1 1 3 3-18 6.0 0 217 3
6 Shenandoah 3 4-3 1 3 3-78 26.0 1 225 4
7 Southern Virginia 3 5-3 3 3 3-0 0.0 0 234 0
8 Guilford 4 11-7 3 2 2--3 -1.5 0 265 3
9 Washington and Lee - 0-0 - - 0-0 - - 0 -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 15 5.0 144 48.0
2 Randolph-Macon 4 15 3.8 144 36.0
3 Ferrum 4 32 8.0 335 83.8
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 14 3.5 97 24.3
5 Bridgewater 3 20 6.7 275 91.7
6 Shenandoah 3 17 5.7 248 82.7
7 Southern Virginia 3 25 8.3 251 83.7
8 Guilford 4 28 7.0 284 71.0
9 Washington and Lee - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 6.7 20 176.3 171.3 5.0 51.0 5 2 21 0
2 Randolph-Macon 4 12.8 51 218.0 132.8 85.3 49.0 2 3 9 0
3 Ferrum 4 20.8 83 265.0 135.8 129.3 61.0 3 5 10 1
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 10.0 40 209.8 149.0 60.8 61.3 5 2 9 0
5 Bridgewater 3 20.0 60 413.3 234.7 178.7 72.3 3 3 3 0
6 Shenandoah 3 32.0 96 405.7 188.7 217.0 75.0 3 1 4 1
7 Southern Virginia 3 33.7 101 402.3 222.3 180.0 78.0 3 3 0 0
8 Guilford 4 43.8 175 471.8 256.0 215.8 66.3 2 2 3 0
9 Washington and Lee - - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Emory & Henry 3 31:49 2,000 1,000
2 Randolph-Macon 4 37:21 616 308
3 Ferrum 4 32:22 1,250 625
4 Hampden-Sydney 4 30:13 1,250 625
5 Bridgewater 3 24:23 250 250
6 Shenandoah 3 28:13 1,000 500
7 Southern Virginia 3 29:14 250 250
8 Guilford 4 24:50 100 50
9 Washington and Lee - 0:00 - -